Friday, 21 June 2013

Sandwell Valley Fantastic Mountain Bike Trail

Well you’ve got to hand it to Sandwell, haven’t you?

Buoyed up, no doubt, by its recent stunning achievement of opening a new college, and, within a year declaring its capacity to be the wrong size (ie 6 times too small !!!!!!!!) Sandwell, ever mindful of the needs of others, has, only last week, completed its latest flagship disaster.

Well, I say ‘completed,’ but with Sandwell, you can’t be quite sure whether it’s finished something or not. In fact, a good proportion of the time, I’ve no doubt that Sandwell itself doesn’t know whether it has finished something. Things just seem to shudder to a halt, and sometimes start again after a few weeks, and sometimes don’t.

But, on the face of it, a new ‘fantastic’ (Sandwell’s word, not mine) mountain bike trail was finished last week.

Of course, disciples of Sandwell will be asking themselves, ‘Can this new; unnecessary; expensive; environmentally damaging folly, even remotely vie for the much contested Sandwell Outstanding Stupidity Award’ which is presently held by Sandwell’s The Public art gallery.

Well, maybe – maybe not.

On the plus side for The Public art gallery, (famous for having almost no art and almost no public) it can boast having doubled its 2001 approved construction budget of £38.3 million, by coming in at a reported £72 million.

That, itself, would be insufficient to hold down the Sandwell Outstanding Stupidity Award for any length of time, but the saving grace for The Public is, that after only 5 years, Sandwell is looking to throw in the towel, draw a veil over the whole sorry project; give the thing away to the brand new undersized college, and try to forget it ever happened.

So I think the Councillors behind The Public are probably feeling fairly confident of hanging on to their SOS Award for a good while yet.

But hang on a minute.

This fantastic mountain bike trail may yet pull a rabbit out of somewhere.

Now, OK, it didn’t cost £72 million, and it hasn’t been shut down yet.

But  potential for killing, or, at least, maiming people is just tremendous.








Have you ever seen anything so crazy in your life? Now I’m the first to admit I know nothing whatever about mountain bike riding. But I do have a degree of common sense!

With cycle paths in some places less than 2 feet wide; hair pin bends; steep cambers; massive rocks along the route and especially on corners, this has to be a recipe for terrible disaster. 



And, yes, Sandwell has put up pygmy sized signs saying that pedestrians and ‘leisure’ cyclists should not go on the new trail. But how many weekenders, or teenagers, are going to take any notice of those, even if they see them?

I take no pleasure in saying that I was dumbfounded and aghast when I saw (part only of) the trail and realised the awful, and inevitable, consequences of its use by the unaware.

Of course, it’s difficult to equate squandered money with human lives or suffering. But in insurance terms, a reasonably young, employed person who is severely disabled through accident, must be easily worth in excess of £6 million – a straightforward death, very much less. But you only need a couple of each of these a year and the fantastic mountain bike trail could top The Public in less than 5 years. And, unlike The Public, which cost an arm and a leg to keep going, the fantastic mountain bike trail will cost almost nothing to maintain. It could go on killing and maiming people for donkey’s years - at no extra cost. 

Well done Sandwell.


This fantastic mountain bike trail isn’t just stupid, it’s absolutely wicked, and if any of Sandwell’s Councillors actually know where the trail is, and what it looks like (which I doubt) they should call for it to be either destroyed, or completely fenced in, allowing only experienced mountain bike riders access, before someone is seriously/terminally injured.

                         *************************

Just as a matter of interest, and as evidence of the quality of thought of whoever it is at Sandwell, compare the notice above, telling 'leisure' cyclists to go and cycle somewhere else, with the one put up by Sandwell in March, 2013, saying that the fantastic mountain bike trail '... will be designed to offer something for all abilities.'



I wonder why Sandwell changed its mind. Could it be that someone, somewhere, deep in the bowels of Sandwell, spotted that it might just have created a Black Country Dignitas?

                                    ******************

And as a matter of further interest, harking back to the new £77 million undersized Sandwell College, where has all the demand for places come from - and why? One web site which I was looking at reported that there were 6 applicants for each place. 

If there had have been enough places available, would that have resulted in other Sandwell 6th form colleges being left half empty?

And what was so attractive about the new college? Was it the great thirst for knowledge and personal development which Sandwell, by its own actions, had inspired in its youth? 

Or was it something to do with the free Samsung Notebooks which were advertised on the Metro for anyone signing up?

                                 *********************

http://www.expressandstar.com/education/2013/06/08/college-plan-for-the-public-to-cost-millions/ makes for interesting reading, especially some of the readers comments!

.







.


6 comments:

  1. I find the idea that someone could be killed using this facility rather ridiculous. By mountain biking standards, the new trail is pretty tame (compare it to what exists at Cannock Chase) and I can't recall a mountain biker ever having died by having a crash on a trail of this type in the UK. The rocks might look scary, but people are only going to be negotiating them at low speed due to the nature of the trail.

    Pretty much all mountain bike trails in the UK are open access. If they were fenced off, huge areas of forest at places like Cannock would would be closed to the public, not to mention the effect on wildlife. Also, how would access be controlled? It's a bit like saying that Snowdonia should be closed to people who aren't experienced walkers, because people could injure themselves.

    Even if people don't see the signs, a leisure rider with no mountain biking experience would realise immediately upon joining this trail that it's for mountain biking. People have to show some personal responsibility and decide whether they have the skills necessary to ride this trail. But at the end of the day, everyone who wants to start mountain biking has to start somewhere, and this facility is actually a good beginners' trail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am obliged to sandwellmtb (smtb) for taking the time and interest to comment on my thoughts concerning the Sandwell Valley mountain bike trail.

    It seems, from the comments made, that he is an experienced rider and so it is reassuring to learn that he cannot recall a mountain biker ever having died in the UK by crashing on a trail like the one at Sandwell.

    I hope that he will still be able to say that in 1;2;3, 4 years time.

    smtb’s assessment of the trail is ‘pretty tame’ and ‘a good beginner’s trail’ which is somewhat at odds with Sandwell’s claim that the trail is ‘fantastic’ and ‘suitable for all abilities.’ But whichever of the two is correct, my perception remains, of it being something which is hazardous, containing, as it does, steep cambers; sharp corners; narrow sections and unyielding boulders, designed, apparently, to test riders, and to hurt them when they fail.

    Smtb finds my suggestion, that someone could be killed on this trail, to be ridiculous. He also pours scorn on my suggestion that, if the trail is to be allowed to remain at all, it should be fenced off permitting only experienced mountain bike riders to use it.

    He says, ‘Pretty much all mountain bike trails in the UK are open access’ – so, if only ‘pretty much all’ are open, then at least some must be closed! Why, therefore, should Sandwell not be one of them?

    He says, ‘If they were fenced off, huge areas …… would be closed to the public.’
    Smtb, the Sandwell bike trail has closed Jubilee Woods to the public just as surely as if a 20ft high wall had been built around it – ask any of the dog walkers.

    If the trail were to be fenced in, smtb asks, ‘How would access be controlled?’
    The same way as it is to the adult climbing frame at the other end of the Valley ie by a man on the gate.

    ‘It’s a bit like saying that Snowdonia should be closed to people who aren’t experienced walkers …’ No smbt. It’s nothing like saying that Snowdonia should be closed to people who aren’t experienced walkers.
    1) Snowdonia, at 2,170 square kilometres must be at least 3 or 4 thousand times bigger than the Sandwell Valley trail. Whilst, therefore, it is for all practical purposes impossible to fence in Snowdonia, it is entirely feasible to fence in the Sandwell trail.
    2) Walkers (on the whole) are inherently more stable than riders; they move more slowly, and, in the event of a fall, are closer than riders to the ground at its inception thereby reducing their velocity; energy dissipation on impact, and the severity of attendant injuries.
    3) Snowdonia contains naturally occurring hazards which affect the careless and the unaware. The Sandwell Valley trail contains man-made hazards designed deliberately to affect all users.
    4) Snowdonia is readily accessible by a relatively few (Snowdonia population about 25,000 and surrounding areas equally sparse.) Sandwell is only a bike ride away from a million plus people.

    ‘People have to show some personal responsibility and decide whether they have the skills necessary to ride this trail.’ Agreed, and what a nicely constructed sentence. The sceptic in me thinks that it is Sandwell speak for ‘…and don’t come crying to us when you break your neck because it was your own silly fault for going on it in the first place.’ I don’t think though that Sandwell would get away with that. My guess is that a strong case could be made against Sandwell for lack of duty of care and negligence in making the track open to the general public.


    My thanks again to smtb for reading the blog and responding to it. As a ‘thank you’ my tip for him for the future is, unless he is prepared to research his arguments more carefully, it’s best to leave the writing to me and just stick to riding himself - in pursuit of which I wish him, and all like-minded sportsmen, 100% safe and injury free riding.

    (Maybe better to avoid the Sandwell fantastic mountain bike trail just in case, even if he thinks it’s pretty tame. It would be most embarrassing if he were to be the first to be stretchered off!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. This article has to be one of the most ill conceived and uneducated pieces ever written about mountain biking! Has John Oakes over been on a mountain bike trail let alone a bike. By other trail centre standards this trail would probably warrant a Green route rating with the harder sections maybe a Blue. Green routes are aimed at beginners/families to get their first taste of mountain biking or that just want an easy days cycling. My 7 year old daughter who isn't the most confident cyclist in the world can manage most blue routes.

    As for slamming the something for all abilities comment by Sandwell, a trail like this is as hard as you want to make it. The less confident will take it easily and slowly whereas a more experienced rider will go a lot faster, trails are as easy or hard as you make them depending on how you tackle them.

    I have taken complete novices round the red route on Cannock Chase with no problems at all, if someone isn't experienced, or even get on the trail by mistake, they are less likely to come to grief than an experienced rider because they will ride within their ability or even get off and push!

    Sandwell need to be commended for their approach with this trail, more authorities need to follow their lead as mountain biking is a massive sport and without initiatives like this encourages mountain bikers to ride in conflict with walkers often illegally

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you're wondering why a mountain bike trail was installed in Sandwell Valley just look at the the man that manages the valley. Mountain biking is his passion.

    ReplyDelete
  5. John oaks is talking out of his oversized , uneducated rectum , I've just took a look at what was built , and its too tame to bother going ,

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have to agree with the comments above. This is a poor blog. I couldn't see the problem at all.

    Indeed, Mountain Biking conjures images of sun drenched alps in most mtb'ers minds but, whilst we're all saving our pocket money for that trip of a lifetime, it's nice to be able to nip out after dinner and do a lap of something at least vaguely interesting. A place like this would provide that for numerous locals of varying abilities. In fact my 7yr old brother could manage this (and he's not even a mountain biker).

    If going to make such ill conceived comments, at least have the tenacity to bother trying it first or perhaps research the subject. This is, believe me, tame when it comes to mountain bike trails. The prospect of someone dying here is, quite frankly, laughable.

    Plonker

    ReplyDelete